The EPA’s city and highway fuel economy ratings are based on the total space within the cabin of a vehicle, measured by the EPA. The Highlander has a total interior cabin volume of 156 cubic feet under the EPA’s measuring standards. Acura’s MDX crossover for 2014 specified 90.9 cubic feet of maximum cargo room, a significant increase from the previous model’s 90.9 cubic feet.
The EPA uses test data derived from vehicle testing at its National Vehicle and Fuel Emissions Laboratory in Ann. The EPA’s rating for a vehicle’s average fuel economy (EPA combined) is determined by the split between highway and city driving. Edmunds’ features and specs page shows an electric vehicle’s official EPA range and energy consumption compared to the range and consumption results from Edmunds’ own testing.
The EPA’s vehicle-size classes make no sense, as they do not account for the difference between small (less than 130 cubic-feet), medium (130-159 cubic-feet), and large (more than 160 cubic-feet). The Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards set a 54.5-mpg average fuel-efficiency goal for the 2025 model.
A SmartWay designation is earned when both the tailpipe pollutant score and CO2 score are 6 or greater and the combined total is at least 13. Edmunds takes on the Environmental Protection Agency’s electric vehicle performance estimates to achieve real-world results.
📹 Tesla Model 3 vs. Model Y vs. Ford Mustang Mach-E: Price, Range, Interior & More
Edmunds experts Alistair Weaver and Carlos Lago compare the pros and cons of Tesla’s Model 3, Model Y and Ford’s Mustang …
What does EPA interior volume mean?
In 1977, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) established standards for automobile classes, defining full-size vehicles as having an interior volume exceeding 120 cubic feet for sedans and 160 cubic feet for station wagons.
What does EPA rating mean?
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for providing fuel efficiency ratings for all commercially available light-duty cars and trucks in the US and listing the official range of all electric vehicles (EVs). The agency uses standardized tests under highly controlled conditions to obtain these figures. The EPA also certifies the range of all EVs, providing a standardized way to compare how far each car can drive when fully charged.
However, the EPA value often differs from the real-world range a car can achieve due to differences in testing protocols and strict rules. Recurrent uses EPA range as a standard measurement to compare cars, not relying on EPA range. For EVs, the EPA uses a value called “miles per gallon equivalent” (MPGe) to measure efficiency. This value converts the amount of energy in a gallon of gasoline to a standard, allowing for comparison of different fuel types. The fuel efficiency values are listed on a Monroney label, affixed to all new cars.
Is EPA good or bad?
EPA, a US FDA-approved prescription drug, is used to reduce triglyceride levels in the blood, prevent clotting easily, and reduce pain and swelling. It is commonly used for heart disease, preventing heart attacks, depression, chemotherapy-related side effects, diabetes, and post-surgery recovery. However, there is no strong scientific evidence supporting many of its other uses. EPA is not to be confused with similar fatty acids like alpha-linolenic acid and DHA. Taking a prescription drug containing EPA (Vascepa) by mouth can lower triglyceride levels by 33 in people with high levels, but it’s unclear if EPA supplements have the same effect.
What is EPA meaning?
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is a federal agency responsible for protecting human health and the environment from adverse effects of pollution. Its functions include research, the development of environmental regulations, and the sponsorship of research. Official government websites, such as the . gov domain, are designed to ensure the secure dissemination of sensitive information.
What is a good EPA level?
The recommended daily intake of EPA for adults is 220 mg, which can be achieved through consuming 2 to 3 servings of fatty fish per week, equivalent to 1, 250 mg EPA and DHA per day. Fish oil supplements should be taken daily, with 3, 000 to 4, 000 mg standardized fish oils. Studies have shown that total omega-3 fatty acids, eicosapentaenoic acid, and docosahexaenoic acid, and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, can reduce the risk of coronary heart disease and improve the cardiovascular system.
Is EPA or WLTP better?
The U. S. EPA standard differentiates between urban and highway driving, providing more accurate fuel consumption estimates. It is considered stricter than the NEDC cyclecycle, with average vehicle fuel consumption around 20 higher. Compared to the WLTP, EPA estimates are on average 11 lower. The Worldwide Harmonized Light Vehicle Test Procedures (WLTP) is a worldwide harmonized test for light vehicles, mainly adopted in Europe.
Implemented since September 2017, it became mandatory for all new vehicles in September 2018, replacing the 50-year-old NEDC standard. It will eventually become the homologation standard for all vehicles worldwide.
What does EPA mean in a car?
The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) employs the measurement of miles per gallon (MPG) in automobiles, which plays a pivotal role in the overall assessment of a vehicle’s performance and longevity. While power, luxury, and speed are important considerations, the EPA provides a list of factors that contribute to the determination of a vehicle’s fuel efficiency.
What does EPA range mean?
The EPA estimated range is the number of miles a vehicle can travel in combined city and highway driving before needing to be recharged. The methodology involves charging the vehicle overnight, driving it on a dynamometer over simulated routes until the battery is depleted. The total distance traveled is then multiplied by a correction factor determined by the number of drive cycles a vehicle is tested on.
This correction factor is always less than 1 but greater than 0, and is determined by the number of drive cycles a vehicle is tested on. Edmunds’ EV range testing provides a real-world version of the EPA’s methodology, as EV owners don’t drive their cars in a lab.
What is a good EPA?
The recommended daily intake of EPA for adults is 220 mg, which can be achieved through consuming 2 to 3 servings of fatty fish per week, equivalent to 1, 250 mg EPA and DHA per day. Fish oil supplements should be taken daily, with 3, 000 to 4, 000 mg standardized fish oils. Studies have shown that total omega-3 fatty acids, eicosapentaenoic acid, and docosahexaenoic acid, and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, can reduce the risk of coronary heart disease and improve the cardiovascular system.
What does EPA mean in air quality?
The U. S. Air Quality Index (AQI) is a tool used by the EPA to assess outdoor air quality and health. It consists of six color-coded categories, each representing a range of index values. Higher AQI values indicate higher levels of air pollution and health concerns. For instance, a 50 or below AQI indicates good air quality, while a 300 or higher AQI indicates hazardous air quality. An AQI value of 100 corresponds to an ambient air concentration equal to the short-term national ambient air quality standard for public health protection.
AQI values above 100 indicate unhealthy air quality, initially affecting sensitive groups but eventually affecting everyone. The AQI categorizes air quality into six categories, each with a specific color, allowing people to quickly identify unhealthy levels in their communities.
What is EPA quality?
The EPA sets water quality standards based on scientific research to ensure safe water for drinking, swimming, and aquatic life habitats. Technology, such as multiparameter sensors, biosensors, and portable devices, aids in real-time monitoring and precise assessment of water quality. Satellite and drone imaging are used for monitoring hard-to-access water bodies, while machine learning and advanced sensors improve water quality prediction and management.
📹 2021 Ford Bronco Sport Review | First Impression of Ford’s Newest 4×4 SUV | Driving, Interior & More
We have been waiting months for Ford’s new Bronco to finally land and today we get a peek at what that name means. In this …
Let’s see if Ford can actually pull of the Mach-E, it’s not in production yet so there is a lot we don’t know about it. Lots of companies have promised a 300 mile range but currently Tesla is the only company that actually achieves it. The lack of supercharging network and autopilot will be a huge disadvantage also. The 7 seater version of the Model Y will also steal some market share. Again, it’s not out yet but I remain very skeptical of the Mach-E, we’ll see what happens when it comes out…
I’m happy to see Ford doing a serious EV from the ground up. Long story short, they’re trying their best to play catch-up with Tesla and doing a fair amount of copying in the process. Can we blame them? Tesla is leading the way. The Ford is certainly not made in America though. It is assembled in Cuautitlán Izcalli, Mexico because there is no way they could make it in American and make a profit on it, while getting anywhere close to Tesla’s specs at a similar price point. I wish Ford the best, their future is really riding on whether or not they can figure this whole EV thing out and fast.
“…if you rely on Electrify America, you’d have to say there lagging a little bit.” Uh yeah. Like as in Tesla has 6 times more fast chargers, all to serve only Teslas. At a much lower price as well. Not to mention that when you own a Tesla you don’t clown around trying to pay (more) at the charger. You drive up, get out, plug in and you’re done. Not so easy w/ Electrify America. Tesla doesn’t use their chargers as profit centers, they cover the cost of the service. Not so w/ Electrify America, where you can actually spend more than you would gassing up an ICE car. The Tesla super charging network is a huge advantage and something almost always brought up by Tesla owners when asked about their car.
Here’s the problem: dollar for dollar kilowatt for kilowatt a consumer is better off buying a Tesla. Why? Because those major car companies can/will/have pulled the plug on EVs. In my humble opinion, Ford would have to commit at least 5 years to two models minimum each before I’d consider buying electric from them…and I have an F-150 and a Fusion in my driveway. I’m not a hater. (GM EV1, Volt, Bolt has proven they won’t commit to EVs so I’d never buy electric from them)
You can’t even compare driving dynamics because you haven’t driven the Mach-E. Clearly someone’s opinions are skewed because they got exclusive invitation to checkout their pre-release vehicle. It’s really the first time that I’ve heard someone say that Tesla’ UI is dated compared to what Ford has to offer… wow. And you know that Ford cannot sell cars online due to franchise laws, so why even mention it and say that Ford is trying? Pointing out the ice box in the frunk as attention to detail is hilarious though.
Seemed to miss discussion on Over The Air software, that has improved Tesla performance and features, after buying car. Also nothing on autopilot that is available in M3 SR+ and what Ford will offer in terms of their own capability, if any. Otherwise some good points made. As a M3 SR+ owner, the spec is definitely adequate and see no need for Performance level. Its quick enough and ride is good. Would up be good if you vould up spec things like sound system to Performance level though.
I recognize you talked about it but I really don’t think the discussions around charging are ever sufficient. The costs and the ease for non-Tesla is a disadvantage that is hard to overcome unless you just hate Tesla/Elon Musk. The other manufacturers haven’t figured this aspect out or just think it is the consumer’s problem. (Tesla isn’t perfect here but is working on it all the time.)
…with Electrify America having 800 chargers currently available compared to Tesla’s over 12,000 superchargers today… to say EA is “lagging a bit behind” is a bit of an understatement. Overall decent conversation though. I do believe the Mach-E will be the first real challenger to Teslas dominance of the EV market. Each has its strengths and weaknesses… competition is good for us consumers though, and hopefully will make EVs better and drive down the cost.
Regarding Model Y 18:35 in “I wish I could get this style vehicle with a smaller diameter wheel” You can, just have to spend 60 seconds looking at the order page. Select the Performance version of the car, but do not click optional “Performance Upgrade” box. Then you get the full performance acceleration, with 19 inch wheels and 30 miles more range. No 21 inch wheels or getting lowered for a bumpy ride.
I really Think the Mach E may pull it off slowly but surely. One reason is your going to get so many Ford loyalists that would never buy a Tesla may get curious about electric. The Mustang name doesn’t really fit on it but it is good marketing. To tell people I have a mustang some middle class soccer moms and others might like to say lol but also the guy that owns a built mustang might want to add and the Mach e mustang to the stable just to have it. You can charge in your garage and at other chargers and eventually there will be more charging stations. Me personally I’m a gas engine guy so Tesla don’t do it for me and they always feel really cheap on the inside. Plus I hate not having gauges in front of me. So if I ever had to get or wanted to get a EV it’s the Mach E plus ford has dealerships everywhere if you do have issues.
As someone that drives a model 3 When I get in any other car to drive I get confused by where everything is just like these people are confused by the Tesla system it’s just what happens when you’re used to something. if I made someone with an Apple phone use an android for a week they would get used to it after a couple days
Mach E is better looking…so true. Although if Elon’s new GigaTexas starys Y production…we can see multi-layer 3D paint on Y which will look dope. As Munro’s teardown shows, Y is culmination of Tesla’s 15 year old journey. Its the best Tesla yet. Issues with Mach E: – Physical button and vertical format central screen — makes next gen “infotainment” tough as Tesla has done for 3. – Next gen battery: Tesla will potentially have next gen chemistry in 1-2 years, just when Mach E is hitting its stride. That will make Tesla cheaper, something E will find tough to match. – Next gen Autopilot: Tesla’s HW3 is rapidly maturing, and by next year will be a very good system…good enough that it can become a critical factor. – V3 superCharger N/W: Tesla continues to rollout and expand V3 network, which Ford just can’t match- without giving huge commitment.
incredibly similar. LMAO yeah, they both have 4 wheels also, 5 doors, 5 seats… LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! oh yeah, the both have a glove box, a trunk, a front trunk, a roof, a bonnet, they both have paint, a windscreen, rear view mirrors… OMG the care are the same!!!!!!, Both have indicator stalks, both have keys and mobile phone access!!!!!! THE CARS ARE THE SAME LMAO!!!!!!!!!! Ford doesn’t do software well, using HTML5!!!!!
Apparently I’m a weirdo, but I don’t see anything even aesthetically superior in the 21″ rims, let alone ride quality disadvantages and pothole susceptibility. I’d prefer to see more tire! Then again, agree that the Model 3’s black, “Aero” wheels look wacky, however the Model Y’s 19″ option looks great to me.
Ford, and everyone else for that matter, is years behind in EV technology. Tesla is about to unveil their million-mile battery, which is going to change the world – dramatically. Not just in the world of transportation, but in energy production, grid storage and the economics of energy in general. It’s unfortunate, but the Mach-E will be outdated the moment it is produced. I’m actually a little worried that Tesla is going to become a monopoly in both transportation and energy production world-wide.
12:23 Tesla still has fewer than 900 Supercharger locations in all of North America, so they aren’t as far ahead of the public charging infrastructure as you’re claiming. While it’s true that that is close to double the current number of Electrify America locations, both ChargePoint and EVgo also have around 800 fast charging locations in the United States.
I appreciate the article, guys, and generally agree with the assessments. I do disagree with one area, which to me is pretty important. It’s claimed that the range between the Model Y and Mach-E are similar or basically a wash. That really isn’t true at all. A long-range Model Y goes 316 miles and is AWD. The most that’s reported for the Mach-E is 300 and you have to get the California Route 1 trim which is only RWD. That’s a pretty significant difference. Any AWD version from Ford is 210 miles – 106 miles different! Coming from a 75D Model X with 225, going DOWN in range when we’re excited to be going way up when our Y arrives is very important to traveling long distances, especially living in Arkansas where there’s only 1 super charge station and it’s in the city in which we live. Range is key and saying Ford and Tesla are on par is really not providing the right info to those trying to decide between the two. Thanks again!
If “Edmund’s Experience” is that you’re only typically getting 85% of the EPA rated range from its Teslas (yes, they’re not just ‘claimed’ range, they are EPA tested & rated) then your experience is far outside the norm and either you drive very different from everyone else, or you don’t understand the EPA rating system nor how EVs relative efficiencies work vs ICE cars on city vs highway miles.
8:20 Complains that Ford has too many varieties but ends up being alike a by offering Base, Premium, Performance all with optional extended range batteries and AWD along with a Special Launch edition called the Route 1 (Premium, 2WD extended range) with unique badges which he cant “Wrap his head around”
Down in San Antone in 1979, the summer of 8th grade year, I remember when my friend Eddie borrowed his older brothers 1969 Mustang Shelby Fastback 428 to drop me off at the bus stop not too far from his house… It was in the middle of the day and we snuck the keys, while his mother was asleep. The car exhaust was loud as hell, so we put it in neutral and (tried to) push it away from the house before we tried starting it — so as not to wake her. We probably pushed it 75 ft and he jumped into the drivers seat and I jumped into the passenger seat. It had a full factory roll bar in it, racing seats and a factory racing harness seat belts. The thing reeked of gasoline and grease, worn carpet, ripped leather, but it was everything I had seen in the magazines from years before. Eddie started the engine and it rumbled to life and sounded like the God Zeus had hurled a lightning bolt of thunder at our feet. Barely able to look over the hood, he dropped it into 1st and it roared, squeaked, rumbled towards down the road like a bat out of hell and we screamed and hollered like it was going out of style…such good times. Honestly, there is nothing like that kind of visceral experience you can have with a car. I might get an electric car one day.
Personally I’m torn between the model Y and the Mach-E . The Mach E will come with the 7500 tax credit which does change things around for me a bit since I plan on buying the base mode of either car. I wonder if the ford will have better part availability than Tesla did/does. As far as charging networks Tesla reigns supreme but I don’t plan on supercharging a lot I’ll more than likely charge up at night at my home… also with Blink chargers popping up everywhere and other competitors it might not be an issue
Google a Tesla repair after a minor wreck, a NIGHTMARE ! Tesla People you all are jaded. May take up to 2 to 3 months to repair, secondly, are you sitting down. A minor body damage repair bill that will make you faint. Tesla body repair issues to clear up, like no parts readily available, thus up to a 2 month delay in parts. Good Luck Tesla people, don’t wreck your car, could be totaled by the cost of a simple repair and the ridiculous wait time.
Never thought that the Mach-E looks good, but if we compare it to the Tesla, it looks much better. You also have to consider that Tesla is not selling cars in a lot of countries. Even if you can get it through a 3rd company, that increases the price significantly, and you still don’t have official places for services. But Ford dealerships are all over the world, so there are no problems.
The ability to customize features at the purchase, to use regular tires instead of low profile ones, full metal frame on door glass allowing to avoid road noise, better adjustable suspension for rough roads, ability to quickly fix the service problem at Ford dealership, constantly improving Electrify America AND other charging networks coming along, more trafitional driving experience with speedometer in front, mechanical knobs for some quick fetures like air conditioning in contrast to burried deeply in touch screen menu of Tesla minimalistic screen, better built interior materials, less road noise, ability to have on air updates in future, full integration with Android and iOS devices, much less vampire drain of the battery notorious for long time parked Teslas might sway some buyers from Tesla to Ford especially considering tax incentives and better ride quality on rough roads.
Hahaha…comparing MACH-E to Tesla Model Y is like comparing Mercedes Benz AMG to Toyota Corolla, and MAG would have better MPG range lol. Facts… Mach-E long range gets 88KW usable battery with 270 MILES EPA range. Tesla Model Y long range gets 75KW battery with EPA range of 326 miles EPA range. So Tesla Model Y long range has 15% LESS battery to be charged, with 20% more range. Mach-E can be charged with 150Kw speed/rate, SLOW ! Tesla Model Y can be charged with 250Kw speed/rate. Mach-E long range in 10 minutes charging gets 58 MILES of range. Tesla Model Y in 10 minutes charging gets 150 MILES of range !! Tesla Model Y long range is MORE efficient by more than 50% than long range Mach-E. Mach-E long range cost of charging will be more than DOUBLE to get the same distance/range as TESLA Model Y long range. So if I pay for Tesla Model Y long range $50,000, I should be able to get Mach-E long range for $25,000. Can I ? Hahaha….Mach-E is a JOKE !!
Ford should make only one model period….their marketing strategy is not well profound…if they really serious to market EV….this is the main reasons why American auto makers are trying to play around American consumers. They should build first single model and go from there instead of making 3 models where unproven performance is unknown….also max out mileage instead of 230, 300 etc….
Good review comparison guys ..I have a long standing early reservation but their colors offered are annoying me…I just want bright red or even a regular white ..It annoys me when I don’t care for the colors being offered and if you want a GT model performance…you lift past the 55 grand limit for state rebates…so the cost is out of rational thought..ford option choice on leasing an electric isn’t easy…you can’t get the GT Mach E in time for the federal credit. Oil pricing is the real reason to wait a few years before going electric anything.
It seems like this review is biased for Ford. Some misinformation about Tesla (“I wish I could get this style vehicle with a smaller diameter wheel” – you can, just click the 19″ wheel selection), as well as ignoring or minimizing Tesla advantages. Tesla over air updates/improvements, better range, AutoPilot, best crash safety rating, Supercharging network is lower cost and much bigger… BTW, Tesla is made in the USA, not the Ford. Oh, volume is on the steering wheel – sheeesh.
Took a Badlands edition for a test drive yesterday. I was looking for something that had better road manners, gas mileage, & interior electronics than the 2018 Jeep Wrangler JKU I own. I had also recently test driven a 2021 Mazda CX-5 GTR turbo AWD. I thought the Bronco Sport was much faster & more fun to drive than either one. Here are some of my observations: I am 5′ 10″ and the rear legroom when I have the front seat adjusted for my height was adequate. However, when exiting the back seats, the area that you have to swing your legs through to get out is very small. I could definitely see the area around the door sill getting scuffed & scratched over time if used frequently. The amount of area that the rear windshield wiper cleans is laughably small. Visibility directly to the rear is adequate but to either side in the rear was hampered by the thick rear pillars. The lack of rear USB ports was disappointing. I was very happy that somebody finally covered both the rear cargo area & the backs of the rear seats with rubber/vinyl for protection. Trying to keep these areas that are fabric in my Wrangler clean is a chore. I once carried two bales of hay…. once! I would have liked to see black leather as an option over just the two-tone brown. I noticed the display on the one I drove had 10.7 average MPG? Not sure what that’s about….? Having said all that I may still get one…
I didn’t drive it but I like the shape, interior space and driving position. Only worried about reliability. By the way, in Canada there’s two different Bronco cars shop.ford.ca/configure/broncosport/model/customize/base?gnav=header-suvs shop.ford.ca/configure/bronco/model/customize/base?gnav=header-suvs
For all the overreacting babies who don’t know how to read This isn’t the actual bronco, this isn’t the actual bronco, this isn’t the actual bronco,this isn’t the actual bronco, this is the bronco sport,this isn’t the actual bronco,this isn’t the actual bronco, the actual broncos are two door and four door body on frame solid axle suvs coming for MODEL YEAR:2021 just incase you guys haven’t read
I must ask is Ford aware of the gouging dealerships are practicing. They are adding a $5-$10,000 Market Value Addendum to the Bronco Sport. That means with the automatic drop as soon as you purchase you can tack on 10g more for a whopping 20g in the hole before my first mile. With everything else going on in this country we have greedy dealers adding this plus the 400% markup on tint and paint protection that they have to put on regardless of if it is special order or not.
wow. another review written directly from the liner notes provided by Ford…. You guys are doing great at sticking by Ford’s strict rules: Only mention items in the liner notes and you will be invited back for future premiers….Everyone is aware you can only say certain things or you get blackballed from future releases… Same with Honda marketing…. How about a real review.