The interior plains in North America were formed through tectonic plate collisions and mountain building millions of years ago. These flat or gently rolling fields account for 18% of Canada’s resources, which are transported across the country using trains, pipelines, trucks, and planes. The Canadian Shield, covering an area close to 5 million km2, is a significant part of this region.
The railway affected the Metis by controlling the land where they had always lived, slowing down the fur trade, and losing jobs with trading companies. The Interior Plains creates various jobs, including ranching, meat processing, cooking, and serving in restaurants. The region covers Yukon, Northwest Territories, British Columbia, Alberta, and other regions.
Sediment transportation within the Interior Plains occurs primarily through aeolian and fluvial processes. The Red River cart was used by the Métis to transport goods and people across the plains, and it could also float across rivers. The interior plains of North America primarily used railways and waterways due to their flat terrain and proximity to other regions.
The weather in the interior plains is extreme, especially up north, with winters being colder than in the Boreal Shield. Shifting climate and weather conditions will affect all modes of transportation in the Prairies. As most of the Interior Plains are flat, transportation of goods and services is easily done by trains, pipelines, and trucks.
In conclusion, the interior plains in North America have a rich history and are crucial for agriculture and natural resources. The railway allowed for the transportation of resources across the region, highlighting the importance of these areas in the region’s development.
📹 How does air circulate in passenger planes? | AFP
Two more Australian Open players have tested positive for the coronavirus, authorities revealed Wednesday, taking to the number …
What are the exports of the Interior Plains?
The Interior Plains, a region in North America, is primarily used for agriculture, with 43. 8 percent of the Great Plains portion used for this purpose in 2000. Wheat is the largest agricultural yield in the region, accounting for over half of the world’s exports. Other significant crops produced include barley, corn, cotton, sorghum, soybeans, and canola, particularly important to Canadian exports. Other smaller sources include forests, wetland, developed land, barren land, and mining land.
The Interior Plains physiographic area spans across Canada and the United States, with each government using a different hierarchical system to classify its portions. In Canada, the region is one of seven physiographic areas, while in the United States, it is one of eight physiographic areas.
What is the economy of the Interior Plains?
The Interior Plains, a region in South America, is primarily engaged in major economic activities such as agriculture and mining. These activities are further divided into livestock and vegetable sectors, which include cattle, pigs, and poultry.
What is the economy of the plains?
Agriculture has been the primary economic base in the Great Plains, despite environmental constraints. The declining moisture gradient has influenced crop production, but technology has helped overcome this variability. Most farmers are wheat producers, but livestock operations are increasingly capturing a greater economic share of agricultural enterprises. Livestock enterprises, including cattle, hogs, and dairy, represent 2/3 of total cash receipts in the heartland states.
The cattle industry is concentrated in Nebraska, Kansas, and Texas, due to the dry climate and open space for waste disposal. This industry is attracted by the dry climate and open space for waste disposal.
What are some challenges of living in the Interior Plains?
The Interior Plains is home to numerous natural resources such as oil, natural gas, coal, forests, and farmland. However, it also experiences severe weather conditions like droughts, flooding, tornadoes, hail, dust storms, blizzards, and ice storms. Agriculture is a major industry in this region, as droughts cause crop death. The Saulteaux, Cree, Blackfoot (Siksika, Pikani, and Kainai) and Dene First Nations developed their way of life on the Plains, hunting caribou, moose, or bison, and traveling on grasslands or forests.
In the 1700s, Francophones explored the region and began trading with the First Nations, setting up fur trading posts. The Cree and Metis people supplied food to fur traders and acted as guides and scouts. The completion of the railway in the late 1800s brought settlers from various parts of the world to the Plains. Bison, also known as buffalo, were crucial to the First Nations people, as they used their hides, skin, bones, horns, hooves, and meat for clothing, shelter, tools, jewelry, and instruments.
What were some problems with living on the plains?
The Great Plains faced harsh conditions, including extreme temperatures, lightning flashes, dry land, and unproductive crops. Plains Indians had to adapt their way of life to survive, relying on hunting buffalo for food and materials. They developed a nomadic lifestyle, following buffalo migrations across the Plains. They lived in tipis, which could be transported easily, and had excellent horse-riding and archery skills. They also developed skills to utilize every part of the buffalo, allowing them to effectively hunt and travel across the Plains. Their survival relied heavily on hunting buffalo.
Why is the Interior Plains good for mining?
The southern portion of the western Interior Plains contains significant mineral resources like potash, salt, oil, natural gas, and coal, all found in sedimentary rocks. The extraction of bitumen from oil sands has become the dominant economic activity in the interior platform. The Hudson Bay Lowlands, characterized by volcanic and sedimentary rocks, contain deposits of copper, zinc, gold, and nickel. The St Lawrence Platform, consisting of the Great Lakes Lowlands and St Lawrence Lowlands, is a major producer of salt and building materials but has few metallic mineral resources.
Why are the plains so important?
Plains are crucial for agriculture due to their deep, fertile soils, which facilitate crop production and support grasslands for livestock grazing. Alluvial plains, formed over time by rivers depositing sediment on flood plains, are areas that experience occasional or periodic flooding. Flood plains are adjacent to lakes, rivers, streams, or wetland that experience flooding regularly, while alluvial plains include areas where flood plains were once or only occur a few times a century.
Outwash plains, also known as sandar, are glacial out-wash plains formed by sediments deposited by melt-water at the glacier’s terminus. Sandar consists mainly of stratified gravel and sand, while till plains are plains of glacial till formed when a sheet of ice becomes detached from the glacier and melts in place, depositing sediments it carries. These plains are essential for agriculture and provide good grazing for livestock.
What is the significance of the Interior Plains?
The Interior Plains region in Canada represents a significant wheat-producing area, with a notable coal mining industry. Alberta is home to substantial quantities of bituminous coal and lignite, while Saskatchewan also produces these minerals in smaller quantities.
How do humans affect the Interior Plains?
The Interior Plains region in Canada is home to a variety of industries, services, and resources. The main industries include farming, which produces crops like wheat, barley, oats, flax, canola, mustard, potatoes, corn, and sugar beets, as well as raising cattle, pigs, and poultry. These crops and livestock feed many Canadians and others worldwide, and are also linked to the tourism industry through rodeos, stampedes, and agricultural shows.
The mining of fuel products like oil, natural gas, coal, potash, copper, zinc, gold, and uranium is crucial for Canadians, as these resources are refined or made into other products. Forest and low mountain areas in the Plains are harvested for the lumber industry or admired for tourism.
The resources found in the Interior Plains are transported across Canada using trains, pipelines, trucks, and planes, making it an essential link for Canadians’ economic development. The plains of Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba are among the richest grain-producing regions in the world.
What are the disadvantages of living in the plains?
A lifestyle based on living on plains presents a number of disadvantages. These include an increased risk of experiencing natural disasters such as tornadoes, a greater likelihood of flooding, higher rates of disease, and restrictions on the types of plants that can be grown, such as coffee. Additionally, soil erosion is a significant issue in these regions.
What do people do living on the plains?
A plain is defined as a region situated in the interior of a continent, where the population density is typically lower. These regions were historically constructed from sod and subsequently cleared for agricultural and livestock operations. In the contemporary era, the majority of individuals residing in these regions are employed in the aforementioned industries.
📹 The Better Boarding Method Airlines Won’t Use
## Related Videos: Voting systems: https://www.youtube.com/embed/s7tWHJfhiyo”560″ height=”315″ src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/oAHbLRjF0vo?rel=0&modestbranding=1″ frameborder=”0″ allow=”autoplay; encrypted-media” allowfullscreen>
I have flown a lot in my 58 years and I will say the real problem began when airlines started charging extra for luggage. Suddenly everyone had carry-ons and this slowed boarding down dramatically. I remember the day when the only thing I took on the plane was my handbag, which I stowed under the seat in front of me after I was seated.
If you wanted the slowest possible method of boarding, front to back seems decent enough, but doing the Steffen method in reverse seems ideal. Front to back, don’t alternate, seated from the aisles out to the window. Maximises seat shuffling, minimises pullaways and parallels. Call it the Steffen Corrupted.
There is one Brazilian Airline (Azul Airlines) that uses the Steffen Perfect. They have projectors in the ceiling of boarding gates that projects on the ground the sets that should be entering in the correct order, meanwhile the other passengers can wait seated. It’s very effective and super fun way to board! hahaha
There is actually an interesting boarding method that the military uses when they do mass transportation of soldiers that is potentially more efficent then Steffan Perfect. When the US Military deploys entire batallions or brigades of troops from one continent to another, they do so by chartering entire 777 or other dreamliner class trans-oceanic flights. The method is back to front, every second isle, but with a twist. You load back to front, no choice of which seat, and you do not stowe your bag immediatly. You sit down in the seat with your bag in your lap and wait. Once the row has filled and the row in front has filled, all bags are passed to the isle seat, who shoves them all into the overhead bins one by one for the entire row. While you are sitting down with your bag in your lap, you have a couple moments to pull out whatever items you will immediatly need and prep your bag to be stowed. I do not know if the method has a specific name, but I experienced it on three separate occations going to or from deployments. This seating method basicly reduces all stopages from stowing bags and from seat shuffling to nearly zero. This however would basicaly never work for a civillian flight for many reasons. People traveling together and trust being the major issues. General travelers will likely not trust in handing their bag of personal belongings to a random stranger to have them stuff it into the overhead, and the random isle-seat passenger will probably not be willing to do the extra work of putting 5-7 bags into he overhead one after another.
It’s weird because here in Europe, I have never experienced boarding groups—It’s always been the ‘planes here’ method. In fact, up until a few years ago, EasyJet didn’t even use allocated seats so you could sit wherever you want. The closest thing to boarding groups I have experienced here is when they open the front and back doors of the planes so you are told if you sit in the rear of the plane to use the back door. They don’t force you or organise you but most people do it on their own as it is legitimately more convenient.
When boarding a domestic flight in Australia, as you enter the aerobridge, there is a sign which directs rows 1-15 to continue along the aerobridge and board the aircraft through the front door, and rows 15+ to walk down the stairs out onto the apron and board using the rear stairs, filling the plane from both ends.
I was on a flight a few months ago and they had a different method where the plane had a door at the front and one at the rear. So it went front to middle and back to middle simultaneously. Seemed like a smart idea, except for the fact that you inevitably got people near the back who entered from the front, or vice versa, and all of a sudden you had an even larger traffic jam than before, since now both lines were getting stopped by whatever random person didn’t enter from the correct door and was trying to move against the flow…
In Australia most airlines board from the front and back at the same time. So if your in rows 15 – 25 you will go to the back of the plane and board via some stairs. Means you don’t have a situation where someone in seat 19 is waiting for people at the front to put their bags away. Doesn’t completely remove the bag issue but it reduces it somewhat.
This is why when I am on a plane I pick the very last row and I blissfully wait my turn both boarding and exiting, because the real bliss is to not let the time it takes get you in a bad mood. If you approach life in this way, everyday is a vacation because you’re just happy to be on a plane at all, remembering all the souls who never have or never will have that privilege. It’s all about perspective.
As a teen I was returning from visiting family in Palm Springs Ca and there was a load of Marines on leave from 29 Palms also departing. Not sure if they were ordered to do so of if it arose organically in their Marine minds but they organized window, middle, isle from back to front with bags they knew where they would fit and the other 8 or 10 of us mere mortals managed to fit in well enough not to much things up and I swear we loaded the plane in about 90 seconds. Well, I’m not sure exactly how fast but it was fast enough that the captain gave the announcement we were leaving early. “You all did such a great job boarding we were able to bump up our departure time by 10 minutes, so we’ll um, be underway I guess… ” You could hear the pleasurable bewilderment in his voice… Departing the plane was just as orderly and with that single flight I experienced nirvana. Never before, never again…
Theoretically speaking, a lot of the delay could be removed by allowing the luggage to be put underneath the seat, underneath a trapdoor on the floor, or just anywhere that is more accessible and convenient than an opening that is only accessible on the aisle of the plane. However, this will come with new complications like the issues of seat shuffling amplified, drastic redesign of the seat itself, further redesign over the placement of the seats. Perfection truly is impossible
I’d heard before that random boarding was significantly faster than group boarding back to front. I think they’re trying to avoid fights for position in line… but they could just assign boarding group numbers randomly and then it would trick people into feeling like there was group organization when there was really none. Just avoiding jostling in random board mode. But of course, if they’re going to change it, they ought to use the alternate row speed max version.
Can I volunteer an idea to help with human’s inability to follow instructions ? It’s the fact that when people don’t know you’re breaking a rule, it’s much easier to break it. An example is people boarding the plane although it’s not their group’s turn. In comparison, when plane staff calls people group by group to UNBOARD the plane (row 1 to 15, 15 to 30 and so on), people tend to follow that rule much more, otherwise it’s OBVIOUS they’re braking it and are trying to take advantage of the system and go past people they were not meant to. SO an idea would be to make rule breaking obvious from the start, for example by printing boarding passes of different colors, and calling them out by colors (« we now invite passengers with a RED ticket to board the plane »). This would draw attention to the ticket’s color which is obvious to everyone, and people couldn’t hope that the front desk staff will « not notice » that they’re from another group. In my mind, it works !
Every Airline in the USA:- “Now boarding…Diamond, Saphire, Ruby, Platinum, Gold, Silver, Military, Express, First Class, Priority, Handicap, Elderly, Family with children, Zone 1, Zone 2, Zone 3, Zone 4…aaaannnddd now we overbooked, let’s spend the next 30 minutes trying to get 5-10 people to go on a flight tomorrow. We’ll start the bid at $200.”
How about, when you check in, you are given a number. Everyone you’re planning to travel with gets the same number. Then you are instructed to take a seat and not get up until your number is called. When your number is called, your number is instructed to fill the leftmost unoccupied seats in the rearmost rows where at least one seat is available. If this is confusing, consider a plane with 6 rows of 3 seats each. Row 1 is the frontmost row and row 6 is the rearmost. Group #1 is a group of 2 and so will occupy the 2 leftmost seats of row 6. Group #2 is a group of 1 and so will occupy row 6’s remaining seat. Group #3 is a group of 5 and so will occupy row 5 and then the two leftmost seats in row 4.
Unless it’s a short flight, I get an aisle seat, so, I just wait in a comfy seat at the boarding gate until almost everyone else has boarded and then casually stroll on. When getting off I move to a seat next to me that’s been vacated already (to ensure I’m not obstructing anyone sitting beside me) and just wait until the herd’s moved on and then get my carry on luggage and stroll off. What’s the big rush to stand in a slow moving queue?
This could easily be solved by having assigned seating in the waiting area. Each seat would have various numbers or labels that would correspond with the waiting area. People would come in and sit in their seat in the order they will be on the airplane. Then one entire row all window A seats could get up at the same time and single file go onto the plane back to front. Now airports have a variety of airplanes, and so it would not be needed to shuffle chairs, one could have different labels (green, blue, red,) and if using airplane A everyone sits in seats according to that color label. A flight attendent could walk around and help people as needed ahead of time, if there were difficulties in getting ready. It might also be easier to do every other row. (We are now boarding A seats even numbers, we are boarding A seats odd numbers.) If the seats were laid out carpet colors or tape on the carpet could make it easier for everyone to “know” where they are on the airplane. This could even include indications for bathrooms and or emergency exits. As parties want to board together, they wait till the last person in the party boards.
I don’t know how the armed forces would get hundreds of soldiers on a plane but i bet when they do it, it’s way faster no matter which method they use. I’m guessing army dudes already have all their shit organized which is the main bottleneck. If you did Steffen Corrupted with a bunch of people who are trained to know exactly where all their crap is at all times, bring exactly what they need, and would get publicly shamed if they whine about their missing chapstick and slippers, it would still go faster than Steffen Perfect for civilians. Also if anyone could make humans actually do Steffen Perfect it would be the military, surely…
one of the reasons we use the current methods is that people with either more expensive tickets or higher “point class” want to get their luggage on the plate. Typically 1/3 of the plane is forced to check luggage. Therefore, the airline wants to give you an incentive to be able to get your bag on the flight by giving you a better boarding position.
I have a tons of ideas to improve boarding : – have more doors – have less seats per row – have more stops so not everyone boards and leaves at the same time – have longer vehicles – have more flexible bag storing, with overhead storing that can be smaller, as well as large accessible bag storing shelves periodically (next to doors and in the middle) Oh, that sounds a lot like a train…
concept: look behind you, if there are people waiting to go past you, quickly squeeze into one of the seats (stand up) with your luggage on the seat – they pass by – you then move back out when the aisle is clear, store your items, sit down. Same theory goes with deplaning – you don’t have items/have them already in your arms – zoom zoom zoom out of there. You have things to get down? Wait until it’s not a major inconvenience, stand up clearly looking like you are waiting but patient, and grab your things down when the line is moving slow, again move to the seat when people need to pass by. Amazing what knowing your surroundings and being conscientious can accomplish.
The window – middle – aisle doesn’t take into account that aisle passengers likely don’t have overhead space and have to go up and down the aisles to put their overhead luggage, which slows down the boarding considerably. This also slow down the disembarking as people in the front have to trek back to get their luggage from overhead bins because they are no longer directly above them. Back to front does not have this same issue, and thus I believe your theory here is flawed from a practical standpoint.
The there’s me who flys Southwest Airlines 95% of the time….and Southwest uses the randomized seasting system. Southwest still uses boarding groups, but all it is, is a way to catergoize who gets on the plane first. If you want to be with your friends or family, you either check in together at the same time so you’ll get a spot in line next to each other, or you can drop back to the lower group and board together there. You can also spend a bit extra money to get early check in so a high chance of being in the A boarding group or even in priority boarding which is A1-A15. Essentially, Southwest plays around with and sells perks that determines who is first in line. But once you’re through that jetway, it’s a free for all for whichever seat you want.
You did mention the flaw that would defeat any improvement in boarding methods, the human inability or just plain unwillingness to follow directions. When I went to basic training in the military some decades ago, we were 80 guys in one unit for many long weeks. To go from one place to another, we marched. To get into marching formation we formed a height line, tallest in the front to shortest in the back, then filed into marching formation. I can’t remember standing behind the same guy twice in a row, ever. Did our relative heights change from one hour to another? I doubt it. We just failed at even the most simple of cooperative tasks.
if every seat had an assigned overhead compartment, i wouldn’t care when i boarded. i would actually prefer to be last on. I am aware that planes dont have space for everyone to put something up there, but if they could design it that way or enforce carry-on limitations it would make flying much less stressful for me. competing for resources makes people crazy..
Actually the REAL reason airlines don’t do that is because it will take way too much organization to perform it. A lot of people could be off at a bar waiting for their flight so they’ll board at the last second (I’ve done that because they didn’t give a seat until last minute), and some in the bathroom, or some dozed off or calling loved ones. To perform this kind of organized boarding would require everyone to be in their position in line to be ready to file in, which never happens. There’s always gonna be that one guy who cuts in line claiming they missed their section call that ruins it for everyone. Not to mention the amount of time it takes for someone to stow away their belongings is also not uniform, which despite the efficient waiting it becomes not optimal as there will be obvious offsets to your organized structure.
No, the fastest way would be to have everyone give their overhead stowage to the crew prior to boarding to be quickly and efficiently stored above the appropriate assigned seat. Then when the passengers board back to front there are zero people stowing bags. Any items used during the flight must be able to fit under your seat, overhead storage are for items you want to take with you without sending them through the normal baggage handling but you don’t need to access during the actual flight.
I just experienced flying on Southwest for the first time yesterday and I love the way they handle boarding. There’s no first class nor assigned seating. You get a number based on when you checked in (or a better number if you paid for automatic check-in or have loyalty status), and you line up at the gate by number. The line is then let loose to get on the plane and everyone sits wherever they want. One peculiar side effect of this is if you’re not carrying a large bag, you have a shot at getting a better seat because the overhead bins fill up faster than the seats do. This creates an incentive to check your bag, which Southwest graciously lets you do for free. Granted this airline only operates 737s so there may be problems with this method for larger planes, or on flights that need to sell premium seats to be viable, but I’ve found it to be much more pleasant than the usual.
Improving boarding and deboarding speeds doesn’t mean anything. The only reason to do that would be to get planes in and out faster. Faster plane turnaround time means more people at the airport at the same time. Which means you have to increase the size of terminals to increase the seating area. Otherwise you have lots of people standing in the walkways. Also means more bags to handle at once. And more people going through security. You can improve boarding and deboarding all you want. All its going to do is transfer the delays to another part of the airport. Unless you spend millions 9f dollars overhauling the entire facility.
I’ve only ever been on flights which let people board randomly. I don’t think back to front or window middle isle is really used in Europe. I prefer random rather than grouping because it doesn’t separate people who travelling together. Most air passengers travel with friends or family and the time feels to pass much faster if you are not split up.
Regarding that last point about exiting the plane: Wouldn’t exiting back to front be even slower? If people in the front are exiting first, you can already get your bags out in the meantime. If the people in the back exit first, you can’t do that, since you have to keep the aisle clear until they’re through
I just realized that in your “modified steffen” animation, you are still assuming that rows will be lined up back to front. But if you really broke up the board groups into 4 that way, you should still see the random shuffling “benefit” where some people will just immediately find their row at the front… I don’t know if that’s factored into your calculation and just the animation is off, but I thought it would be worth mentioning
Eh, but don’t you realize how parents would flip out for having to leave their children behind (assuming that they are sitting next to each other but would of course be in different boarding groups)? I wouldn’t trust a 6-year-old me to wait patiently at the terminal for my boarding group while both of my parents are already seated on the plane
WizzAir and RyanAir have a method where the airplane is open from the front and back – and on your ticket it says if you should board from the front or back. I don’t understand why you didn’t even address this in your article, given that low cost airline companies are huge and make even more profit than full service airlines.
One of the things that absolutely infuriates me is when I have to constantly bend down to check the seat numbers, they’re never where you want them to be. As I don’t want to hold the line up for any more time than is strictly necessary, counting the rows while bending over constantly is a massive pain. I just don’t understand the utility in not having seat numbers in a place where they can be seen by everyone. I flew to Germany from the UK a few months ago and it absolutely staggered me how unnecessarily awkward that was. Running the gauntlet of the aircraft aisle while carrying a hold all and having to do it while maintaining a ridiculous posture just like absolute insanity. On the trip back they were much more clearly laid out and I swear I got to my seat in about half the time. And for what it’s worth, I’m only about 195cm/6ft 4 so I’m tall but not like a giant or something, there will be people who suffer this plight far worse.
You could implement Steffen Perfect by putting numbered circles on the floor at the gate in rows/columns, arranged such that a column will get loaded at once. This is a really simple way to get everyone in the correct arrangement. You ask people to go stand on their circle. Then you direct a column to proceed into the plane, etc. If someone doesn’t want to participate because they are in a family group, they can sit out until the last column is loaded. This incentives participation.
Last week I was flying out of Seattle on a a330. over a quarter of the flight was families with kids younger than 2. Boarding them alone took 20 minutes with them taking their times in both isles loading their crap in the over head. Flight was a tad delayed because of it. And that’s not including the crying, screaming throughout the flight lol
I flew from Schiphol (Amsterdam) to Arlanda (Stockholm) and in Schiphol they did nothing people just walked in. And this was way faster than in Stockholm where they filled the plane front to back. But not everyone heard this.(due the lack of signs as I’m hoh idk what is going on) So they kept sending people back to the end of the queue. They needed way more people to put people in order. It was also really slow and people where annoyed because they where in line earlier but got send back
Using Steffan Perfect by grouping people as with Steffan Modified, but then asking them to line up according to their seat number alongside some conveniently numbered pillars or something seems practical enough. Allowing for some exceptions like for families and it should be way more efficient and plenty easy to follow. It’s all a completely moot point when you are going to have to wait for takeoff and wait for your luggage after landing. It doesn’t matter how fast you board or exit, since unless you really just can’t wait to hang out in the airport itself something else is going to be the real bottleneck on your time.
I think once people arrive at the gate, they should be put through a simple assessment like the NFL scouting combine, then assigned boarding groups. Pettite fit woman with no carry-ons and a window seat? Group 1! Teenager with headphones, a vacant stare, and 16 water bottles dangling? Group infinity!
While I do see your point of “seconds wasted for every human” when trying to board in the back to front method, I feel like those seconds will be lost anyway when considering the time taken for check in baggage to be loaded. I experienced this when I was one of the last passengers aboard the plane which used back to front boarding, and I was still seeing baggage being loaded into the plane after I had settled in my seat. Even if airports were to adopt the “Steffen Modified” method, there has to be some sort of improvement to the loading of check in baggage to actually make it faster. Not to mention the “earthing” of the plane, refueling, system checks, outside checks, etc. which could slow down the plane leaving the gate even more.
You assumed that all passengers have assigned seats, but Southwest doesn’t – however, they do line everyone up in a unique order, except for some special classes – handicapped, families with babies, etc. So of all the airlines, they might be the most open to your proposal since it would involve the least change on their part. They’d just need an algorithm to assign seats as people checked in – the hard part would be keeping couples and families together. But people would complain no matter what the system is.
Another consideration with regard to boarding method is weight and balance. If everyone in the back boards first without anyone in the front of the cabin to counterbalance their weight, the aircraft’s nose could tip up in the air and possibly create a tail strike. It sounds ridiculous, but it can and does happen. The loading of baggage and cargo must be coordinated with boarding to ensure the aircraft stays firmly planted.
The best is to not fly. Covid protocols proved what I already had thought, business travel is obsolete in the tech age of zoom and conference meetings. And once you’ve been a couple places for say vacations and see the few moments of pleasure isn’t worth all the wasted time of prepping, traveling too, unpacking, planning, replanning, and traveling back, plus visiting friends or family isn’t worth the momentary thrill that turns into a tedious stay, you’ll enter a type of simple bliss, it’s very Buddhist. Get a dog instead.
It’s funny that the guy illustrated a plane with the logo of an european low cost airline on the tail, but completely ignored the actual fastest boarding method that is very used by this type of airline: ditching the airbridge and boarding from front and rear door. Also, boarding by groups from back to front has a problem: the risk of the aircraft tipping (having no weight at the front can make the plane nose lift).
De-planing, I have started getting up when at least two rows behind me have all left. Then, while a person far behind me takes his/her bag from the overhead stowage, I do the same, thus saving everybody behind me a few seconds. Call it my gift to humanity. Maybe one day it means someone behind me actually managed to catch the tight connecting flight, when otherwise he or she would have missed it😄
Also, considering the right schedules of airlines assuming time is wasted while in the queue for boarding is time you could have gotten back doing anything else is kind of wrong isn’t it? Even if every airline adopted the new boarding policies you propose it wouldn’t save a dramatic amount of time would it?
4:22 the problem with this demonstration is thinking we are robots. Of course ailes shifting will happen no matter what. The human factor tells us that you always have someone not happy with the seat they have been given and will ask someone else to switch taking even longer negotiating not to mention people apparts from their relative that want to go back or front or people who have mistakenly read their seat number…